伪娘
Australia's defense‑funded report hypes risks to subsea cables to 'serve military goals'_我的网站
一 | 1月11日晚，据媒体报道，中盛集团近期发布内部文件称，将从现在起停止对所有新会员的审批和汽车之家广告设计；已签约未付费的汽车之家年度会员平台经销商将暂停付款；以及如果签名或签名过程未完成，则将暂停签名或签名过程。
二 | 据媒体报道，汽车之家被汽车经销商中盛集团封锁，汽车之家方面发表声明称，尚未从官方渠道收到中盛集团封锁汽车之家的官方信息。
Published by the National Security College at the Australian National University (ANU), the paper claimed recent damage to cables in the Baltic Sea and around China's Taiwan region suggests "state actors are now actively probing and testing cable infrastructure in peacetime as part of broader hybrid warfare strategies" to rapidly degrade connectivity at the outset of a conflict, The Australian reported.
The paper claimed 16 privately owned subsea cables that carry 99 percent of Australia's internet traffic are a "high priority target" for Australia's adversaries that could be severed in a conflict, threatening the nation's economy and social fabric, according to The Australian.
The report singled out China and Russia for blame, saying that there have been multiple apparent attacks on submarine cables in recent years in European waters as well as near China's Taiwan region, suspected to be linked to Russia and China, the Straits Times reported.
However, the report cites a 2025 voyage by Chinese research vessel Tan Suo Yi Hao along Australia's western and southern coastlines as evidence to back its claim that "potential adversaries are actively gathering information about Australia's cable infrastructure."
This report, relying on the routine scientific operations of a Chinese research vessel in 2025 to level allegations of offensive actions against China, and employing ambiguous terminology such as "suspected" and "potential," demonstrates Australia's evidentiary leap, Chen Hong, director of the Australian Studies Center of East China Normal University, told the Global Times on Monday.
This erroneous claim was refuted by the Chinese Foreign Ministry at the time. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said on March 31, 2025 that China carries out normal activities at sea in accordance with international law, including UNCLOS.
"We hope Australia will have a right understanding of this and stop the groundless suspicion and speculations," Guo added.
This is not the first time certain Australian politicians has leveled baseless accusations of China intending to sabotage its undersea cables. Back in May, Defense Minister Richard Marles claimed during the Shangri-La Dialogue that China ought to boost transparency around its maritime operations. He also asserted that a surge in damage to subsea cables had transformed the seabed into a "battlefield," per The Australian.
Chen said Australian side's scaremongering is tied to its predictive threat‑perception framework forged in recent years. This framework designates China and other countries as strategic competitors in advance, subsequently forces routine scientific activities into a confrontational framework, Chen said.
Apart from unfounded allegations against China, the paper claims Australia's defense military "must incorporate the defense of submarine cable infrastructure into its operational planning," according to The Australian.
It added the government should also consider up¬grading an auxiliary ship operated by the navy, ADV Guidance, to enable it to repair damaged cables.
The vast majority of submarine cable damages are caused by accidental factors such as fishing operations and vessel anchoring, rather than deliberate sabotage. For suspected cases of intentional damage, independent technical investigation bodies should be established, and the principle of "investigate first, characterize later" should be strictly applied, so as to prevent ordinary maritime accidents from escalating into diplomatic conflicts, Chen said.
The core problem of Australian side's submarine cable security lies entirely with itself. Instead of addressing its own infrastructure shortcomings and improving its domestic protection and maintenance systems, the Australian side has chosen to continually exaggerate external threats and stoke bloc confrontation, the expert added.
Chen said that by fabricating alleged Chinese threats, Australian side seeks to "rationalize" its military spending increases and underwater force expansion. The submarine digital infrastructure originally meant to serve global development has been labeled along us versus them lines, and this constitutes the biggest hidden danger, he added.
。价格谈判在商业合作中是正常的。即使没有达成协议，也不存在谁会阻止谁的问题。中盛集团是全国汽车经销商集团之一。拥有广泛的全国性4S分销网络，重点经营梅赛德斯-奔驰、雷克萨斯、奥迪等豪华车品牌，以及丰田、日产、本田等高端车品牌。据媒体分析，中盛集团与汽车之家暂停合作的主要原因是集客渠道有限，排水成本越来越高。作为回应，汽车之家方面发表声明称，尚未从官方渠道收到中盛集团想要禁止汽车之家的官方信息。汽车之家还表示，商务合作中的价格谈判是正常的，即使没有达成协议，也不存在谁会杀谁的问题。汽车之家保留向法律申诉和追究造谣者法律责任的权利。
三 | （张军）以下是汽车之家声明全文：1.我们还没有从官方渠道收到中盛集团将禁止汽车之家的官方信息。汽车之家与中盛集团的合作是互惠互利的，以往的合作进展非常顺利。价格谈判在商业合作中是正常的。即使没有达成协议，也不存在谁会阻止谁的问题。汽车之家保留向法律申诉和追究造谣者法律责任的权利。2019年1月11日。
Current article:http://1bptnvi.rangnehongranlinren.bond/17pq/luin.html
Published on:01:17:22
